Jump to content

Is Gausman Thursday's starter? (Officially Wednesday)


wildcard

Recommended Posts

That is Gausman's night to pitch after starting for Norfolk last Sat. Buck has not announced a starter yet.

He has averaged a 0.00 ERA in his last three starts with a 1.06 WHIP in 75 pitches in 4.2 IP. He is ready to move to 90 pitches.

See what Roch has to say:

http://www.masnsports.com/school-of-roch/2014/05/uncertainty-in-orioles-rotation-this-week.html

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 171
  • Created
  • Last Reply
That is Gausman's night to pitch after starting for Norfolk last Sat. Buck has not announced a starter yet.

He has averaged a 0.00 ERA in his last three starts with a 1.06 WHIP in 75 pitches in 4.2 IP. He is ready to move to 90 pitches.

See what Roch has to say:

http://www.masnsports.com/school-of-roch/2014/05/uncertainty-in-orioles-rotation-this-week.html

He just got back from the DL, he is still on a pitch count, we don't need him, he needs to pitch at AAA....

Why does this proposed move make sense?

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He just got back from the DL, he is still on a pitch count, we don't need him, he needs to pitch at AAA....

Why does this proposed move make sense?

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

It doesn't. He might as well have pointed out that Gausman, not Gonzo, was on the team calendar.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'd be very surprised if Gausman were called up, considering that Gonzalez was very good his last time out and Gausman hasn't been allowed to exceed ~75 pitches yet and still has some things to work on. I covered all that in another thread and won't repeat all my points here.

At the same time, I am not going to say it's impossible.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why would they replace Gonzo. He had a very good game last time out. You have Gausman on the brain.

Because he has been more consistent than Gonzalez. Gonzalez can easily be transitioned to the BP and may actually be a guy we can consider for closer. He has not been great so far this year in the rotation and because he had one good start is not a great reason.

I could even envision a scenario where they promote Gausman and Chen and Gonzalez are skipped for their respective starts as Gausman is stretched out effectively giving us a six man rotation.

Then again it may be too soon. We are in 1st place, but I would be in support of the move.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think Gonzo is the starter most in danger of losing his job to Gausman, but we're not at that point yet.
Gonzo is only in danger of losing his job if the fans are making the decision. It's ridiculous. If Chen is injured it doesn't make sense to start Gonzo on short rest
Link to comment
Share on other sites

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" lang="en"><p>Expect the Orioles will announce the two TBA starters later tonight.</p>— Brittany Ghiroli (@Britt_Ghiroli) <a href="

">May 13, 2014</a></blockquote>

<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Because he has been more consistent than Gonzalez. Gonzalez can easily be transitioned to the BP and may actually be a guy we can consider for closer. He has not been great so far this year in the rotation and because he had one good start is not a great reason.

I could even envision a scenario where they promote Gausman and Chen and Gonzalez are skipped for their respective starts as Gausman is stretched out effectively giving us a six man rotation.

Then again it may be too soon. We are in 1st place, but I would be in support of the move.

I'll have what your smoking.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • It is absolutely possible. In 2022, the Mets gave a QO to Bassitt, Nikki, and DeGrom. The Red Sox gave a QO to Boegarts and Eovaldi. The Yankees gave a QO to Judge and Rizzo. The Dodgers gave a QO to Turner and Anderson. I know that it seems to be a foregone conclusion that Santander will not be on the team after this season, and while I generally agree that it is more probable than not that he will not be re-signed, I do think there is a non-zero chance that he will be retained. I think he is the most likely of Mullins, Hays, and himself to be retained, even if it is a small chance. The team has told us how they feel about his bat because he plays essentially everyday, and I have heard Kostka say that they value his clubhouse presence.
    • Santander won’t get a QO, and if he did, he would accept. His defense is declining and we have too many capable youngsters who should replace him effectively. But to your question, I don’t know if there’s a limit, but I doubt it.
    • O's will probably have to wait till July for a trade because there are so many more buyers than sellers.  I think teams like the Blue Jays, Rays Tigers and Mets are likely to be sellers but they are still in the race although not very good teams as constituted. 
    • No Scott. He’s way too undependable. We need someone who WON’T enter a game and walk folks like he’s promoting a healthy lifestyle. He’s been a lot bette4 this season, but he’s too undependable, and we already have too many of those. No Flaherty either. That’s like taking your GF back after she cheated on you.
    • The team's continued success has really put Elias on the spot IMO and I don't see a Flaherty type as an option anymore.  My money is on a sensible trade that comes at a price high enough that most of us here, including myself, won't like, but a premium comes with having bad luck and that's where the O's are at the moment.
    • I would be very surprised if every last one of the GM's Elias talks to about quality starting pitching doesn't start by asking about Westburg and the rest.  Again, I think it's a mistake to believe that the O's have a ton of leverage here.  They certainly have some, and Elias is smart and disciplined, but I don't see any bargains.  I especially don't see the luxury of acting like youth and multiple years of control is any kind of rigid starting point for the O's.
    • I say this as someone who defended Cowser like 2 posts ago, but like his fWAR number is entirely dependent on how much you're buying his defense.  I can totally buy the argument that maybe OAA is overrating him a bit, so he's not really on pace to be a 5.5 win player.  The OAA number is pretty eye-popping.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...